Traffic that finally converts
Technical audit with crawl and speed fixes, buyer-intent on-page work, internal links rebuilt.
Visits 2,140 → 4,432 · orders 116 → 149
You do not need a technical SEO agency with a project manager to find out why Google ignores half your site. You need someone who can read a crawl, a log and a Search Console report, and who can explain the fix to your developer without the jargon.
Illustration. Real logs look like this, only longer.
Technical SEO is the work of making a website easy for search engines to crawl, index, load and understand, so that the pages you want to rank can rank. A technical SEO agency, or a specialist doing the same work, checks how Google moves through the site, which pages it keeps and drops, how fast pages load for real UK visitors on real phones, whether the structured data is correct, and whether redirects, duplicates and errors are quietly wasting Google's attention.
Take the crawl figure from Search Console's Crawl stats report and your own sense of the site. Rough, but the direction is usually right.
A rough model. Google does not crawl evenly, and it says crawl budget mostly matters for very large or fast-changing sites. The point is the ratio of waste to real pages.
| Problem | How you notice it | The fix |
|---|---|---|
| Pages crawled but not indexed | The Pages report in Search Console grows in the wrong column | Merge thin or duplicate pages, strengthen internal links, improve the content that is left |
| Filter and parameter URLs | Thousands of URLs for a few hundred products | Canonicals, robots rules and cleaner navigation so one version is crawled |
| Slow pages on mobile | Core Web Vitals fail in Search Console | Image sizes, fonts, lazy loading, fewer scripts, better hosting |
| Redirect chains and loops | Old URLs bounce twice before landing | One hop from old to new, and internal links updated |
Google measures how real visitors experience your pages with three figures: how quickly the main content appears, how fast the page responds to a tap, and how much the layout jumps while loading. It calls them LCP, INP and CLS and reports them in Search Console from real Chrome users.
The thresholds are published: main content within 2.5 seconds, a response within 200 milliseconds, and a layout shift score under 0.1, for most of your visitors. The sites I audit fail most often on the first one, usually because of a huge hero image, a slow theme or too many apps and plugins.
Speed is a small ranking factor and a big conversion factor. A page that loads in two seconds on a train with one bar of signal earns more enquiries than one that loads in eight. I fix the causes, not the score.

The whole site crawled and compared with what Google has indexed, so wasted and missing pages are both visible.
Image, font, script and hosting fixes, with before-and-after numbers from real users.
Canonicals, redirects, parameters, pagination and sitemaps tidied so Google spends its time on real pages.
Schema for your organisation, local business, products, services and FAQs, validated and kept valid.
WordPress, Elementor, Shopify, WooCommerce and BigCommerce each break in their own ways. I know where to look.
Search Console checked every week, so a bad plugin update or a developer's slip is caught in days, not months.
What a crawler finds, what Google requested, and what Google kept: three views of the same site.
Hundreds of symptoms become a short list of causes, ranked by how many pages and how much revenue each one touches.
Blockers first: noindex, robots, redirects. Then duplicates and speed. Then structure and schema.
Each fix written as a ticket. On WordPress and Shopify I can usually apply them directly.
Index coverage, Core Web Vitals and rankings tracked, with monitoring so problems do not creep back.
Blockers removed. Pages that were hidden by a tag or a rule start to be crawled again.
Indexing improves, redirect chains disappear, Search Console errors fall. Core Web Vitals fixes show in field data after about a month.
Rankings move for pages that were held back by duplicates or slow loading. Rich results appear where schema was added.
A clean site makes every later page and link work harder. This is where technical work pays off most.
Technical SEO cannot rank a page nobody searches for, or beat a competitor with more useful content.
The developer hid the site from Google during the build and nobody removed the tag. Weeks of invisibility.
Google needs those files to render the page. Block them and it sees a broken layout.
Colour, size, price and sort create thousands of URLs for a few hundred products, wasting crawls and splitting signals.
After a redesign, old URLs sent to the home page lose their rankings. Each should go to its closest match.
Caching, lazy loading and image plugins fighting each other make a site slower, not faster.
| Task | Do it yourself? | Why it is usually handed over |
|---|---|---|
| Submit a sitemap and check the Pages report | Yes | Reading what the columns mean takes experience |
| Compress and resize images | Yes, with a plugin or app | Themes often load the full-size image anyway |
| Fix a few broken links and redirects | Yes | Chains across hundreds of URLs need a crawl and a plan |
| Clean up filter and parameter URLs | Rarely | One wrong canonical or robots line can hide real pages |
| Write and validate structured data | Possible on simple pages | Stores and multi-location sites need careful nesting |
Technical work shows up in Search Console graphs that belong to the client, so I publish them only with permission. These two businesses, one in the UK and one in the US, agreed, and in both cases crawl and speed fixes came before anything else.
Technical audit with crawl and speed fixes, buyer-intent on-page work, internal links rebuilt.
Visits 2,140 → 4,432 · orders 116 → 149
Crawl and speed fixes, keyword targeting, more content and better internal links.
Clicks 706 → 1.99K · position 20.7 → 13.3
One UK store and one US business; labels show which.
A full technical audit with every fix written as a ticket. About £395. Your developer can run with it from here.
Audit plus the fixes, done by me or with your developer, and weekly monitoring. About £630 a month.
Large stores and multi-site setups, with faster delivery and quarterly re-crawls. About £1,580 a month.
I do the work myselfI'm Muhammad Zohaib Ameer. I have worked in SEO since 2022 for businesses in the US, UK, Canada and the UAE. I read crawl logs for fun, which is not normal, but it means your developer gets a precise ticket rather than a vague complaint.




“Before you pay anyone for technical SEO, open Search Console and look at one report: Pages. If the number of pages not indexed is bigger than the number indexed, you have found your first conversation.”
Muhammad Zohaib Ameer · OvaVerseSend your website. Within 48 hours you get a short recorded video audit showing the crawl, index and speed problems I can see from outside, and which to fix first.
The photo on this page is a custom AI-generated illustration, not a real client or event. Diagrams and sample numbers are labelled illustrations; case study screenshots are real.